The titular qualities of Sense and Sensibility, by Jane Austen, are more complex than they appear at first. Each quality is meant to embody one of the two Dashwood sisters. Elinor is the one with sense; she is rational, polite, and well-behaved. Marianne is the sister with sensibility, passionate and judgmental. However, both sisters are well-bred, intelligent, literate, and sensitive. They are complex themselves, and Austen uses this complexity to avoid a trap that the title suggests. Because the sisters are complex and interesting characters, it seems unlikely that either sister could be adequately described by one quality, sense or sensibility. Instead, Austen begins by identifying each sister with her respective quality, and as the novel progresses, each quality is invested with the personality and behavior of its respective sister, and so becomes more complex. For example, the dichotomy of sense and sensibility also becomes one of sacrifice and selfishness. If one has sense, one will see the necessity of sacrificing one’s own happiness or release for the sake of others. But how does this affect the happiness of the character with sense? This dichotomy and its association with the titular dichotomy creates an approach to one of the main problems of the story, of deciding which sister is more admirable, and which sister’s philosophy is best.
Sense and sensibility are invested with complexity due to their complete association with one sister each. This would not be possible if Austen did not immediately make this association clear and powerful. It would be easy to dismiss each quality as being a part of each character, but not being the defining quality of that character, her personality, and her behavior. For example, in Pride and Prejudice, the titular qualities are the two that divide Elizabeth Bennet and Mr. Darcy in love. The opposition is a romantic one, based on conflict between their classes and dispositions. However, these qualities do not affect their lives much in non-romantic situations In Sense and Sensibility, the opposition is between two philosophies of life, not just of love. It is a greater battle. Austen creates a greater dramatic tension in this battle by making each character representative of one quality. In the first chapter, Austen mentions Elinor for the first time, saying that she “possessed a strength of understanding, and coolness of judgment. [...] She had an excellent heart;– her disposition was affectionate, and her feelings were strong; but she knew how to govern them” (6). The title has implied that one sister must have sense, and this lists of Elinor’s traits implies that she must be that sister. The description of Marianne immediately following makes this even clearer, for “She was sensible and clever; but eager in every thing; her sorrows, her joys, could have no moderation. She was generous, amiable, interesting: she was every thing but prudent” (6). It is interesting that Austen calls Marianne “sensible,” a word that could mean that she has either sense or sensibility. All of the qualities listed imply sensibility, but Austen creates tension with this ambiguity about the identity of each sister. The next paragraph clarifies this point: “Elinor saw, with concern, the excess of her sister’s sensibility” (7). The character herself acknowledges the dichotomy of the title, and the author’s listing of other qualities verifies it for a second time. Each character, then, is immediately described in the terms of each quality, and becomes the embodiment for that quality.
The dichotomy of sacrifice and selfishness is also established in these first pages. Elinor’s sacrifice often takes the form of forced politeness. When the reader is first introduced to Elinor, it is while she is giving her mother advice about politeness and courtesy. The father of Elinor and Marianne has just died, and immediately following his funeral, their half-brother and his wife, John and Fanny Dashwood, move into the Norland estate. Mrs. Dashwood is horrified at Fanny’s eagerness for the inheritance, and “So acutely did [she] feel this ungracious behaviour, and so earnestly did she despise her daughter-in-law for it, that, on the arrival of the latter, she would have quitted the house for ever” (6). Like Marianne, Mrs. Dashwood feels no need to disguise her disapproval of the actions of others. But the family does not move, because “her eldest girl induced her first to reflect on the propriety of going” (6). Elinor’s feelings, as described on this page, are just as strong as those of her mother. She, too, is indignant about Fanny’s lack of courtesy. However, Elinor “could struggle, she could exert herself” (7). Her sense indicates to her the need for politeness, in order to ensure her family’s welfare, and so she makes the sacrifice of conversation and negotiations with her brother. Marianne and her mother, in contrast, “gave themselves up wholly to their sorrow, seeking increase of wretchedness in every reflection that could afford it, and resolved against ever admitting consolation in future” (7). Their sensibility, or access to freedom of emotion and expression of that emotion, leads to a selfishness in their behavior. They are so involved in their own emotions that they refuse to listen to sense, and leave Elinor to the unhappy task of ignoring and indeed working against her own feelings.
Elinor’s association with sacrifice is most noticeable in her relationship with Edward Ferrars, and her disappointment in that relationship. At the beginning of the novel, there is “a growing attachment between [Mrs. Dashwood’s] eldest girl and the brother of Mrs. John Dashwood, a gentlemanlike and pleasing young man” (15). Elinor believes that this man, Edward Ferrars, loves her, and trusts that love to lead to an engagement. She is brutally disappointed, then, when she meets an illiterate and scheming girl named Lucy Steele, who confides in her that she and Edward have been engaged for four years. Eleanor’s sacrifice first takes the form of politeness against the natural inclination of anger and distress, as in the first chapter; when Lucy reveals her secret, Elinor responds “with a composure of voice, under which was concealed an emotion and distress beyond any thing she had ever felt before. She was mortified, shocked, confounded” (135). Elinor knows that Lucy is telling her this partially to hurt her and to claim Edward as her own, and her response aims to deny Lucy some of her pleasure. She also wants to mask any thoughts she had of an engagement or the feelings she has, for the sake of her own propriety and good name. In a situation like this, Marianne would express her anger, disgust, and sorrow by visibly expressing her emotions and leaving the room, but Elinor forces herself to stay, be calm, and learn more.
Elinor’s sacrifice is pronounced by her inability to tell anyone about her heartache. She cannot tell because the secret “had been entrusted in confidence to herself” (141). A sense of honor contributes to her silence, although it is difficult for her to mask her feelings. It is only possible because of her awareness of sense and of propriety and appropriate exertions. In addition, “it was a relief to her, to be spared the communication of what would give such affliction to them” (141). Throughout the novel, Elinor is forced to be the messenger of bad news. When others are too overcome by emotion to communicate messages, Elinor must control her own emotions and bring grief to those she loves. In this passage, Elinor seems conscious of two things. She knows that she sacrifices her emotional relief for the emotional easiness of those around her. She cannot communicate out of a fear of bringing pain to others. She is also conscious that her sister and mother will experience their pain in a far more obvious way than she does. The relief to her is in not having to experience their selfishness in this form. By not telling them, she is free to avoid their self-absorption, to some extent, and indulge her own. Their selfishness, then, is actually a cause of her sacrifice, not just a quality in opposition to it. Elinor’s sacrifice is even more present when Marianne is jilted by Willoughby. Marianne’s experience of pain after the relationship has ended is self-absorbed and all-consuming. Elinor not only avoids telling Marianne of her own grief, in fear that it will add to Marianne’s already tumultuous feelings, but acts in ways that have the possibility of increasing her own heartache in order to protect Marianne. When Mrs. Dashwood recommends that the girls extend their stay in London, Elinor agrees. She knows
"that it would not be in her power to avoid Edward entirely, [but] comforted herself by thinking, that though their longer stay would therefore militate against her own happiness, it would be better for Marianne than an immediate return into Devonshire." (214)
Marianne and Elinor have experienced similar losses: each believed that a man loved her and trusted that a marriage with that man was somewhere in her future. Each lost that man to another woman, after finding out that he was deceitful. Austen implies that both feel the same depth of emotion at this betrayal. However, Elinor is the one who makes the sacrifice for the other; she acknowledges the damage to her own happiness in guarding that of the other. Sense, then, and an ability for emotional restraint and the consideration of others, is a quality associated with the sacrifice for sensibility, and selfishness.
Marianne’s selfishness originates in her powerful sensibility. She experiences her emotions in a way such that she thinks the emotional experiences of others do not compare. Because Elinor is more restrained, Marianne thinks that she must feel less. When Marianne receives the letter of rejection from Willoughby, Elinor watches as “covering her face with her handkerchief, [Marianne] almost screamed with grief” (182). This primal emotional reaction is one of the most chilling moments in the book; here, Marianne’s experience of her feelings is physical and painful. Elinor sits near her, having already shed her tears, and watches with sympathy but without much outward display of it. Elinor is far more self-possessed and calm than Marianne is. She appears the same to the outside world in grief as she does in joy. Because of this, Marianne does not realize Elinor’s unhappiness. Perhaps Marianne’s judgment should be more acute; perhaps Elinor’s behavior has shifted enough that a sister more sensitive to the moods of others would notice it. However, Marianne is self-absorbed enough, or Elinor is sacrificial enough, that Marianne does not realize that anything has changed. She cries, “Oh! how easy for those who have no sorrow of their own to talk of exertion! Happy, happy Elinor, you cannot have an idea of what I suffer” (185). Marianne here makes a comparison: grief outweighs happiness. It is possible that grief is only the more powerful emotion because Marianne is the one who is experiencing it. She also ignores any uncertainties of Elinor’s own situation, which seems like an odd mistake for her to make; she herself has just lost her love and learned the pain of an uncertain romantic situation. Marianne may be eager to think of Elinor as happy because this is her last remaining comfort, but even this is selfish. Elinor is left to reply, “Do you call me happy, Marianne? Ah! if you knew!– And can you believe me to be so, while I see you so wretched” (185). Elinor begins with a hint at her true feelings and a defense of her own grief, but then quickly hides it again by saying that her grief is rooted only in Marianne’s own sadness. Once more, Elinor sacrifices her relief for Marianne’s selfishness.
Near the end of the book, the characters undergo a dramatic change in their relationship to sense and sensibility. Elinor has always had some connection to sensibility in that she experiences strong emotions but doesn’t display them. However, at the end of the novel, her character truly embraces sensibility, out of necessity. Her emotional sacrifice and caution throughout the novel builds up to a point where it cannot last any longer. In the course of one conversation, extreme grief gives way to extreme happiness, and this is when Elinor’s self-control fails her. She learns that Edward Ferrars will not marry Lucy Steele, and in this moment, can hardly mask her true feelings. Then, she “could sit it no longer. She almost ran out of the room, and as soon as the door was closed, burst into tears of joy, which at first she thought would never cease” (360). This is behavior very characteristic of Marianne; the violent expression of feeling and rapid exit of rooms with guests is not at all like Elinor. Elinor’s self-control is so vanished that she must physically remove herself from the room to preserve any appearance of calmness. Marianne, in contrast, suddenly gains access to sense in a way she never has before. Her illness gives her this access; she is never as sentimental or identified with sensibility after she has recovered. She tells Elinor,
"My illness has made me think– It has given me leisure and calmness for serious recollection. [...] I saw in my own behaviour since the beginning of our acquaintance with [Willoughby] last autumn, nothing but a series of imprudence towards myself, and want of kindness to others. I saw that my own feelings had prepared my sufferings." (345)
Marianne acknowledges the similar trials that Elinor faced, and how much more admirably she acted in those situations. Her sensibility actually becomes a source of pain to her, and she renounces what was previously the governing philosophy of her life. She decides to act with more sense and generosity in the future.
As might be expected, the two sisters also undergo a change in their relationship to sacrifice and selfishness. Elinor never becomes selfish in the blatant way of Marianne earlier in the novel; the closest example to that is in the scene mentioned above, when she disregards propriety by running out of the room and crying noisily in the hall. However, Elinor’s selfishness is implied in Marianne’s new ability for sacrifice. Like Elinor, Marianne, when she has sense, is not unwilling to make her sacrifices. Sense leads her to believe that these sacrifices are necessary and most beneficial for all. Marianne makes her sacrifice in her marriage to Colonel Brandon. Although “in time, [Marianne’s heart became] as much devoted to her husband, as it had once been to Willoughby” (379), Marianne begins the marriage with no more than esteem and friendship for Colonel Brandon. She is encouraged in this marriage by all of her family and friends:
"To see Marianne settled at the mansion-house was equally the wish of Edward and Elinor. They each felt his sorrows, and their own obligations, and Marianne, by general consent, was to be the reward of all. With such a confederacy against her– [...] what could she do?" (378)
Marianne enters into the marriage willingly, but it is a sacrifice. Elinor loves her sister and wants the best for her, but she also objectifies her. Marianne “was to be the reward of all” of Colonel Brandon’s good deeds and qualities. Her family and friends do not force her to marry Colonel Brandon, although they encourage it strongly. Instead, she is forced into a marriage by sense, “Instead of falling a sacrifice to an irresistible passion, as once she had fondly flattered herself with expecting” (378). It is ironic that Marianne should be a sacrifice in either case, to sense or to sensibility. In love, which is perhaps the most appropriate application for sensibility, Marianne renounces sensibility and looks instead to sense. Sense includes the rational process of making one’s needs equivalent with the needs of others, and for this reason, demands sacrifices like Marianne’s. At the end of the novel, she pays penance for her earlier sensibility by sacrificing her desire for a passionate marriage.
Elinor is described as the role model for the reader, but the complexities of sacrifice and selfishness, and sense and sensibility bring this into question. Marianne says to Elinor, “Your example was before me: but to what avail?– Was I more considerate of you and your comfort?” (346). Elinor is the example we should all follow, the woman who is capable of restraining emotions with intellect and better judgment. But having this example doesn’t lead Marianne to follow it, for much of the novel, and doesn’t help Elinor at all. Marianne ends the story married to a wealthy man, who loves her deeply and has taken an active part in pursuing her, and with the assurance that another man she loved has loved her in return. Both of Marianne’s suitors are appealing and engaging. Edward, in contrast, has been an honorable but passive hero throughout the novel, and seems to be much less than Elinor deserves. Marianne’s indulgence, as well as her sacrifice, doesn’t seem to have materially hindered her. What does this mean? The novel could be viewed as a “problem novel,” since it ends with Marianne entering into a passionless marriage and sacrificing her happiness. Her acceptance of sense may be a defeat. Neither sister, then, could truly be admired. A second option is that Marianne may, in contrast to Elinor, better know when to use sense and when to use sensibility. She may be better suited for happiness because she is cannier in her use of philosophies. Marianne, then, is more admirable. Whereas Elinor is often boring, Marianne is interesting, and does it in a way that helps her. Many possibilities are available, one of which, of course, is that Austen does in fact intend the reader to admire Elinor rather than Marianne.
The dichotomy of sacrifice and selfishness is one that does not immediately draw sympathy for a character with either quality. Although the reader can admire sacrifice, it is not in a way such that the reader would ever like to be the character who makes the sacrifice. Selfishness is also unappealing, but compared to sacrifice, becomes a better option. It is a dichotomy that enriches the titular pair of traits, making it more complex and thus making our exploration of the characters who embody those traits more complex. Because of this added depth, the reader can better evaluate the two opposing philosophies and judge the fate and behavior of the sisters with more ease.
WORKS CITED
Austen, Jane. Sense and Sensibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1982.